4.3 Article

Perspectives on Sexual Health, Sexual Health Education, and HIV Prevention From Adolescent (13-18 Years) Sexual Minority Males

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEALTH CARE
卷 35, 期 5, 页码 500-508

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2021.04.008

关键词

HIV/AIDS; sexual health; adolescent health; sexual minority youth; qualitative research

资金

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [GS-10F-0033M/HHSD2002013M53955B/200-2015-F-88276]
  2. NORC at the University of Chicago [7836.TFI.01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study identified the attitudes of ASMM towards sexual health, barriers and facilitators to accessing sexual health information, and the disparities between actual and ideal interactions for receiving sexual health care and information. The findings highlighted the current gaps in sexual health knowledge among ASMM and the barriers and facilitators to obtaining sexual health information and care.
Introduction: Adolescent sexual minority males (ASMM) are at disproportionate risk of HIV infection. The purpose of this study was to assess ASMM's attitudes about sexual health, barriers/facilitators to accessing HIV prevention, and actual versus ideal interactions for receiving sexual health care and information. Method: Two online and two in-person focus groups were conducted with ASMM from across the United States. Qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis. Results: Twenty-one racially diverse ASMM participated (average age = 16.4 years). Online focus groups were superior for reaching the target population. Four themes emerged: 1: identity formation and sources of support, 2: challenges to obtaining sexual health information, 3: attitudes/beliefs about sex and sexual behaviors, and 4: barriers to HIV prevention. Discussion: These findings illustrate current gaps in sexual health knowledge, as well as barriers and facilitators to obtaining sexual health information, sexual health care, and affirming education and support for ASMM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据