4.7 Article

Polyhalogenated Bicyclo[1.1.1]pentane-1,3-dicarboxylic Acids

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 86, 期 15, 页码 10303-10319

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.1c01020

关键词

-

资金

  1. Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry of the Czech Academy of Sciences [RVO: 61388963]
  2. Czech Science Foundation [20-13745S, 20-01472S]
  3. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports [LTAUSA19120]
  4. National Grid Infrastructure MetaCentrum [CESNET LM2015042]
  5. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports from the Large Infrastructures for Research, Experimental Development and Innovations project [e-Infrastructure CZ-LM2018140]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Highly selective radical chlorination of 2,2-difluorobicyclo[1.1.1]pentane-1,3-dicarboxylic acid was reported, resulting in new bicyclo[1.1.1]pentane cages carrying fluorine and chlorine atoms. The positions of halogen atoms and acidity constants were confirmed by X-ray diffraction and capillary electrophoresis, respectively, with experimental values in agreement with those predicted by DFT methods. Extensive DFT calculations were used to rationalize the selective formation of isomers and determine relative strain energies.
Herein we report the highly selective radical chlorination of 2,2-difluorobicyclo[1.1.1]pentane-1,3-dicarboxylic acid. Together with radical hydrodechlorination by TMS3SiH, four new bicyclo[1.1.1]pentane cages carrying two fluorine and one to three chlorine atoms in bridge positions have been obtained. The exact positions of all halogen atoms have been confirmed by X-ray diffraction. The acidity constants (pK(a)) for all new derivatives have been determined by capillary electrophoresis, and these experimental values show excellent agreement with pK(a)s predicted by DFT methods. Extensive DFT calculations have been used to rationalize the selective formation of four out of nine possible F2Cl1-4 isomers of bridge-halogenated bicyclo[1.1.1]pentanes and to obtain relative strain energies for all possible isomers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据