4.7 Article

Multiple Reaction Pathways of Eight-Membered Rhodacycles in Rh-Catalyzed Annulations of 2-Alkenyl Phenols/Anilides with Alkynes

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 86, 期 15, 页码 10484-10491

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.1c01143

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21973055, 21903038, 21803024]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2019MB049, ZR2020KB017, ZR2020MB055]
  3. Taishan Scholars Program of Shandong Province
  4. Young Innovative Science and Technology Program for Colleges and Universities of Shandong Province: Innovative Research Team on Theoretical and Computational Chemistry [2020KJC009]
  5. Shandong University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Density functional theory calculations were used to investigate the competing pathways of rhodacycle intermediates in Rh(III)-catalyzed annulations of 2-alkenyl phenols and 2-alkenyl anilides with alkynes. The results reveal that the multiple pathways of eight-membered rhodacycles can be subtly tuned to give specific cyclic products. The formation of different cyclic products from 2-alkenyl phenols and 2-alkenyl anilides is governed by different pathways involving the dissociation of Rh-O bond and intramolecular olefin migratory insertion, respectively.
Density functional theory calculations were performed to study the competing pathways of rhodacycle intermediates generated in Rh(III)-catalyzed annulations of 2-alkenyl phenols and 2-alkenyl anilides with alkynes. The results show that the multiple pathways of eight-membered rhodacycles can be subtly tuned to give specific cyclic products. The seven-membered oxacyclic and spirocyclic products from 2-alkenyl phenols are formed by favoring the pathway of dissociating the Rh-O bond of O- contained rhodacycles, which are followed by antarafacial nucleophilic attack. The indoline product from 2-alkenyl anilides is generated through the pathway of intramolecular olefin migratory insertion of the N-contained rhodacycle.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据