4.3 Article

Energy dependent calculations of fission product, prompt, and delayed neutron yields for neutron induced fission on 235U, 238U, and 239Pu

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 59, 期 1, 页码 96-109

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00223131.2021.1954103

关键词

Fission Product Yield; Hauser-Feshbach Stastical Decay; Prompt Neutron Multiplicity; beta Decay; Delayed Neutron Yield

资金

  1. Los Alamos National Laboratory [89233218CNA000001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Energy-dependent calculations of fission product yields for different fissile materials were conducted and compared with experimental data. The study also investigated the possible impact of second chance fission on the energy dependence of delayed neutron yield.
We perform energy-dependent calculations of independent and cumulative fission product yields for U-235, U-238, and Pu-239 in the first chance fission region. Starting with the primary fission fragment distributions taken from available experimental data and analytical functions based on assumptions for the excitation energy and spin-parity distributions, the Hauser-Feshbach statistical decay treatment for fission fragment de-excitation is applied to more than 1,000 fission fragments for the incident neutron energies up to 5 MeV. The calculated independent yields are then used as an input of beta-decay calculations to produce the cumulative yield, and summation calculations are performed. Model parameters in these procedures are adjusted by applying the Bayesian technique at the thermal energy for U-235 and Pu-239 and in the fast energy range for U-238. The calculated fission observable quantities, such as the energy-dependent cumulative yields, and prompt and delayed neutron yields, are compared with available experimental data. We also study the possible impact of the second chance fission opening on the energy dependence of the delayed neutron yield by on the opening of second chance fission on the energy dependence calculation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据