4.7 Article

Corrosion behaviour of plasma sprayed Fe based metallic glass (Fe73Cr2Si11B11C3 (at%) coatings in 3.5% NaCl solution

期刊

JOURNAL OF NON-CRYSTALLINE SOLIDS
卷 567, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2021.120913

关键词

Atmospheric plasma spraying; Coating; Microstructural analysis; Amorphous; Corrosion resistance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Fe-based composite coatings deposited by atmospheric plasma spraying showed better corrosion resistance compared to the steel substrate, regardless of the coating thickness. The coating with a thickness of 110 +/- 12 μm exhibited the best corrosion resistance, attributed to optimal content of amorphous, porosity, and surface roughness.
In this study, Fe based amorphous/nanocrystalline composite coatings with different coating thicknesses were deposited on a mild steel substrate by atmospheric plasma spraying (APS) using a low Cr-containing gas atomised amorphous Fe73Cr2Si11B11C3 (at%) powder. The corrosion behaviour of the amorphous/nanocrystalline coatings of different thickness was investigated using potentiodynamic polarization and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) analysis in a freely aerated 3.5 wt% NaCl solution. The variation in microstructural characteristics of the coatings with various coating thicknesses and the effect of the surface morphology, porosity content, surface roughness and amorphous content in the coatings have been correlated with the corrosion behaviour of the coatings. The results demonstrate that the corrosion resistance of the plasma sprayed Fe based composite coatings is better than that of the steel substrate regardless of coating thickness. Moreover, the best corrosion resistance of the coating with a thickness level of 110 +/- 12 mu m is attributed to (i) its optimum presence of content of amorphous, porosity, and surface roughness, (ii) excellent film and charge transfer resistance, and (iii) higher protection ability of the rust as compared to the other coating thickness values.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据