4.7 Article

Heat But Not Mechanical Hypersensitivity Depends on Voltage-Gated CaV2.2 Calcium Channel Activity in Peripheral Axon Terminals Innervating Skin

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 41, 期 36, 页码 7546-7560

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0195-21.2021

关键词

cacna1b; calcium channel; conotoxin; hyperalgesia; N-type calcium channels; nociceptor

资金

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [NS055251, F31NS093818, T32NS062443, K99NS116123, DP2-NS106664]
  2. National Institute of Mental Health [T32MH020068]
  3. Warren Alpert Foundation Fellowship Award
  4. New York Stem Cell Foundation [100003194]
  5. Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Functional Ca(V)2.2 channels in peripheral axons innervating skin are required for capsaicin-induced heat hypersensitivity, which may be an important therapeutic target for certain forms of chronic pain.
Voltage-gated Ca(V)2.2 calcium channels are expressed in nociceptors at presynaptic terminals, soma, and axons. Ca(V)2.2 channel inhibitors applied to the spinal cord relieve pain in humans and rodents, especially during pathologic pain, but a biological function of nociceptor Ca(V)2.2 channels in processing of nociception, outside presynaptic terminals in the spinal cord, is underappreciated. Here, we demonstrate that functional Ca(V)2.2 channels in peripheral axons innervating skin are required for capsaicin-induced heat hypersensitivity in male and female mice. We show that Ca(V)2.2 channels in TRPV1-nociceptor endings are activated by capsaicin-induced depolarization and contribute to increased intracellular calcium. Capsaicin induces hypersensitivity of both thermal nociceptors and mechanoreceptors, but only heat hypersensitivity depends on peripheral Ca(V)2.2 channel activity, and especially a cell-type-specific Ca(V)2.2 splice isoform. Ca(V)2.2 channels at peripheral nerve endings might be important therapeutic targets to mitigate certain forms of chronic pain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据