期刊
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 41, 期 36, 页码 7662-7674出版社
SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2459-20.2021
关键词
computational modeling; decision making; electroencephalography; forward encoding analyses; signal integration
资金
- Australian Research Council (ARC) [CE140100007]
- ARC Australian Laureate Fellowship [FL110100103]
The study found that temporal integration of discrete sensory events in the brain is automatically and suboptimally weighted according to stimulus reliability.
Many decisions, from crossing a busy street to choosing a profession, require integration of discrete sensory events. Previous studies have shown that integrative decision-making favors more reliable stimuli, mimicking statistically optimal integration. It remains unclear, however, whether reliability biases operate even when they lead to suboptimal performance. To address this issue, we asked human observers to reproduce the average motion direction of two suprathreshold coherent motion signals presented successively and with varying levels of reliability, while simultaneously recording whole-brain activity using electroencephalography. By definition, the averaging task should engender equal weighting of the two component motion signals, but instead we found robust behavioral biases in participants' average decisions that favored the more reliable stimulus. Using population-tuning modeling of brain activity we characterized tuning to the average motion direction. In keeping with the behavioral biases, the neural tuning profiles also exhibited reliability biases. A control experiment revealed that observers were able to reproduce motion directions of low and high reliability with equal precision, suggesting that unbiased integration in this task was not only theoretically optimal but demonstrably possible. Our findings reveal that temporal integration of discrete sensory events in the brain is automatically and suboptimally weighted according to stimulus reliability.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据