4.7 Article

Sparse Coding in Temporal Association Cortex Improves Complex Sound Discriminability

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 41, 期 33, 页码 7048-7064

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3167-20.2021

关键词

auditory; electrophysiology; Neuropixels; sounds; TeA

资金

  1. NVIDIA Corporation
  2. European Research Council [616063]
  3. Israeli Science Foundation [224/17]
  4. Gatsby Charitable Foundation
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [616063] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

TeA in the mouse auditory cortex is less sensitive to pure tones compared to other auditory fields, but more sensitive to frequency modulated sweeps. Neuronal responses in TeA are sparser, delayed, and prolonged, indicating a distinct processing characteristic within the cortical hierarchy.
The mouse auditory cortex is comprised of several auditory fields spanning the dorsoventral axis of the temporal lobe. The ventral most auditory field is the temporal association cortex (TeA), which remains largely unstudied. Using Neuropixels probes, we simultaneously recorded from primary auditory cortex (AUDp), secondary auditory cortex (AUDv), and TeA, characterizing neuronal responses to pure tones and frequency modulated (FM) sweeps in awake head-restrained female mice. As compared with AUDp and AUDv, single-unit (SU) responses to pure tones in TeA were sparser, delayed, and prolonged. Responses to FMs were also sparser. Population analysis showed that the sparser responses in TeA render it less sensitive to pure tones, yet more sensitive to FMs. When characterizing responses to pure tones under anesthesia, the distinct signature of TeA was changed considerably as compared with that in awake mice, implying that responses in TeA are strongly modulated by non-feedforward connections. Together, these findings provide a basic electrophysiological description of TeA as an integral part of sound processing along the cortical hierarchy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据