4.4 Article

Interocular suppression in primary visual cortex in strabismus: impact of staggering the presentation of stimuli to the eyes

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 126, 期 4, 页码 1101-1111

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00275.2021

关键词

anomalous retinal correspondence; diplopia; exotropia; ocular dominance column; suppression scotoma

资金

  1. National Eye Institute [EY029703, EY02162]
  2. Research to Prevent Blindness
  3. National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office of the Director [OD011107]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In strabismus, interocular suppression is necessary to prevent double vision. Although previous studies suggest that neuronal firing inhibition in the primary visual cortex only occurs when stimuli are presented sequentially, the recordings in alert macaques raised with exotropia showed limited evidence to support the idea that staggered stimulus presentation is more effective at inducing interocular suppression of V1 neurons.
Diplopia (double vision) in strabismus is prevented by suppression of the image emanating from one eye. In a recent study conducted in two macaques raised with exotropia (an outward ocular deviation) but having normal acuity in each eye, simultaneous display of stimuli to each eye did not induce suppression in V1 neurons. Puzzled by this negative result, we have modified our protocol to display stimuli in a staggered sequence, rather than simultaneously. Additional recordings were made in the same two macaques, following two paradigms. In trial type 1, the receptive field in one eye was stimulated with a sine-wave grating while the other eye was occluded. After 5 s, the occluder was removed and the neuron was stimulated for another 5 s. The effect of uncovering the eye, which potentially exposed the animal to diplopia, was quantified by the peripheral retinal interaction index (PRII). In trial type 2, the receptive field in the fixating eye was stimulated with a grating during binocular viewing. After 5 s, a second grating appeared in the receptive field of the nonfixating eye. The impact of the second grating, which had the potential to generate visual confusion, was quantified by the receptive field interaction index (RFII). For 82 units, the mean PRII was 0.48 +/- 0.05 (0.50= no suppression) and the mean RFII was 0.46 +/- 0.08 (0.50= no suppression). These values suggest mild suppression, but the modest decline in spike rate registered during the second epoch of visual stimulation might have been due to neuronal adaptation, rather than interocular suppression. In a few instances neurons showed unequivocal suppression, but overall, these recordings did not support the contention that staggered stimulus presentation is more effective than simultaneous stimulus presentation at evoking interocular suppression in V1 neurons. NEW & NOTEWORTHY In strabismus, double vision is prevented by interocular suppression. It has been reported that inhibition of neuronal firing in the primary visual cortex occurs only when stimuli are presented sequentially, rather than simultaneously. However, these recordings in alert macaques raised with exotropia showed, with rare exceptions, little evidence to support the concept that staggered stimulus presentation is more effective at inducing interocular suppression of V1 neurons.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据