4.6 Article

Comparison of CSF and serum neurofilament light and heavy chain as differential diagnostic biomarkers for ALS

期刊

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2021-327129

关键词

-

资金

  1. EU Joint Programme-Neurodegenerative Diseases networks Genfi-Prox [01ED2008A]
  2. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [FTLDc 01GI1007A]
  3. EU (Moodmarker) programme [01EW2008]
  4. German Research Foundation/DFG [SFB1279]
  5. foundation of the state Baden--Wurttemberg [D.3830]
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim Ulm University BioCenter [D.5009]
  7. Thierry Latran Foundation [D.2468]
  8. ALS association [D.5809]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study showed that elevated levels of NfL and NfH in ALS patients compared to other neurological disorders. The correlation between CSF and serum NfL was stronger than that of NfH. CSF NfL had the best diagnostic potential for ALS, followed by CSF NfH, serum NfL, and serum NfH.
Objective Elevated levels of neurofilament light (NfL) and heavy (NfH) chain in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum reflect neuro-axonal degeneration and are used as diagnostic biomarkers. However, studies comparing the differential diagnostic potential for ALS of all four parameters are missing. Here, we measured serum NfL/NfH and CSF NfL/NfH in a large cohort of ALS and other neurological disorders and analysed the differential diagnostic potential. Methods In total CSF and serum of 294 patients were analysed. The diagnostic groups comprised: ALS (n=75), frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) (n=33), Alzheimer's disease (n=20), Parkinson's disease (dementia) (n=18), Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (n=11), non-neurodegenerative controls (n=77) (Con) and 60 patients who were seen under the direct differential diagnosis of a patient with ALS (Con.DD). Results CSF and serum NfL and NfH showed significantly increased levels in ALS (p<0.0001) compared with Con and Con.DD. The difference between ALS and FTLD was markedly stronger for NfH than for NfL. CSF and serum NfL demonstrated a stronger correlation (r=0.84 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.87), p<0.001) than CSF and serum NfH (r=0.68 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.75), p<0.0001). Comparing ALS and Con.DD, receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed the best area under the curve (AUC) value for CSF NfL (AUC=0.94, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.98), followed by CSF NfH (0.93, 95% CI 0.88 to 0.98), serum NfL (0.93, 95% CI 0.89 to 0.97) and serum NfH (0.88, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.94). Conclusion Our results demonstrate that CSF NfL and NfH as well as serum NfL are equally suited for the differential diagnosis of ALS, whereas serum NfH appears to be slightly less potent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据