4.5 Review

Fluid metabolic pathways after subarachnoid hemorrhage

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
卷 160, 期 1, 页码 13-33

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jnc.15458

关键词

cerebrospinal fluid circulation; cerebrum microdialysis; energy metabolism; glymphatic system; microcirculation disturbance; subarachnoid hemorrhage

资金

  1. State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burn and Combined Injury [SKLYQ202002]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [82030036, 82071397]
  3. Southwest Hospital [SWH2018BJKJ-05]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is a devastating cerebrovascular disease with complex pathophysiological processes, including early brain injury and delayed cerebral ischemia. Current efforts have not led to significant improvements in patient prognosis, indicating the need for further research on potential therapeutic targets.
Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is a devastating cerebrovascular disease with high mortality and morbidity. In recent years, a large number of studies have focused on the mechanism of early brain injury (EBI) and delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), including vasospasm, neurotoxicity of hematoma and neuroinflammatory storm, after aSAH. Despite considerable efforts, no novel drugs have significantly improved the prognosis of patients in phase III clinical trials, indicating the need to further re-examine the multifactorial pathophysiological process that occurs after aSAH. The complex pathogenesis is reflected by the destruction of the dynamic balance of the energy metabolism in the nervous system after aSAH, which prevents the maintenance of normal neural function. This review focuses on the fluid metabolic pathways of the central nervous system (CNS), starting with ruptured aneurysms, and discusses the dysfunction of blood circulation, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) circulation and the glymphatic system during disease progression. It also proposes a hypothesis on the metabolic disorder mechanism and potential therapeutic targets for aSAH patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据