4.7 Article

Too Hot to Handle: Antibacterial Peptides Identified in Ghost Pepper

期刊

JOURNAL OF NATURAL PRODUCTS
卷 84, 期 8, 页码 2200-2208

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.1c00281

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH-NIGMS [R01GM125814]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study identified 115 putative AMPs within the Capsicum chinense genome, of which 14 were found in the aerial tissue peptidome. Two novel AMPs, CC-AMP1 and CC-AMP2, were fully characterized using peptidomics and bioactivity-guided discovery, showing low mu M antimicrobial activity against Gram-negative bacteria, including Escherichia coli. These findings highlight the potential of peptidomics and bioinformatics-based investigations in characterizing plant AMP profiles.
Capsicum spp. (hot peppers) demonstrate a range of interesting bioactive properties spanning anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antimicrobial activities. While several species within the genus are known to produce antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), AMP sequence mining of genomic data indicates this space remains largely unexplored. Herein, in silico AMP predictions were paired with peptidomics to identify novel AMPs from the interspecific hybrid ghost pepper (Capsicum chinense x f rutescens). AMP prediction algorithms revealed 115 putative AMPs within the Capsicum chinense genome, of which 14 were identified in the aerial tissue peptidome. PepSAVI-MS, de novo sequencing, and complementary approaches were used to fully molecularly characterize two novel AMPs, CC-AMP1 and CC-AMP2, including elucidation of a pyroglutamic acid post-translational modification of CC-AMP1 and disulfide bond connectivity of both. Both CC-AMP1 and CC-AMP2 have little homology with known AMPs and exhibited low mu M antimicrobial activity against Gram-negative bacteria, including Escherichia coli. These findings demonstrate the complementary nature of peptidomics, bioactivity-guided discovery, and bioinformatics-based investigations to characterize plant AMP profiles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据