4.6 Article

Bimetallic nanoparticles grafted ZnO hierarchical structures as efficient visible light driven photocatalyst: An experimental and theoretical study

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE
卷 1236, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2021.130355

关键词

ZnO nanostructures; Bimetallic nanoparticles; Organic dyes; Density Functional Theory; Photocatalysis

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology, Government of India through the DST INSPIRE Faculty project [IFA15 MS41]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reported the photocatalytic activity of NiAg NPs embedded on hierarchical ZnO structures, showing that the synergistic effect of the bimetallic NPs on ZnO led to enhanced photocatalytic performance. Experimental and computational results confirmed the improved photocatalytic activity of NiAg-ZnO.
Bimetallic nanoparticles (NPs) exhibiting novel properties due to synergy between the individual ele-ments have sparkled significant interest as a co-catalyst in enhancing the photocatalytic efficiency of semiconductor materials. Here, we report the photocatalytic activity of NiAg NPs embedded on hier-archical ZnO structures (NiAg-ZnO). Structural and morphological investigations through X-ray diffrac-tion and scanning electron microscopy confirmed the formation of NiAg-ZnO. UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy revealed the decrease in the bandgap energy of NiAg-ZnO (2.65 eV) in comparison to pris-tine ZnO (3.1 eV). Interestingly, the rate of photodegradation of methylene blue and rhodamine B dye molecules under visible light irradiation are two to three times enhanced with NiAg-ZnO in comparison to Ag-ZnO. Enhanced visible light absorption and effective charge separation due to the synergistic metal-semiconductor interface formed by the embedment of NiAg bimetallic NPs on ZnO led to the improved photocatalytic activity. Experimental results are further confirmed through the first principle electronic band structure calculations. ? 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据