4.6 Article

Ultrasound-based synthesis, SC-XRD, NMR, DFT, HSA of new Schiff bases derived from 2-aminopyridine: Experimental and theoretical studies

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE
卷 1233, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2021.130105

关键词

Schiff base; Ultrasonic; Crystal structure; Theoretical calculations; Hirshfeld surface analysis

资金

  1. Ardakan University
  2. Payame Noor University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focused on the rapid and efficient preparation of Schiff bases using ultrasonic irradiation, with confirmed crystal structures and non-covalent interaction mechanisms. Density functional theory calculations showed good correlation between experimental and calculated data, and investigated keto-phenol tautomerism forms.
The present work is related to the rapid and efficient preparation of Schiff bases ( 1 and 2 ) by reaction of 2-aminopyridine derivatives with 3-ethoxysalicylaldehyde under ultrasonic irradiation. The advantages, of using ultrasonic irradiation, are short reaction time, high yield and the ability to carry out large scale reactions. After characterization by NMR spectroscopic technique and elemental analyses, the crystal structures of compounds were confirmed by single crystal X-ray analysis (SC-XRD). For further elaboration of non-covalent interactions in the stabilization of packing of molecules, Hirshfeld surface (HS) inspection was accomplished by using crystal explorer software. B3LYP/Def2-TZVP level of theory was used to calculate electronic and structural parameters of synthesized compounds. Optimized structures and calculated data showed good correlation with experimental ones. In addition, two models of keto and phenol tautomerism were studied by calculating thermodynamic parameters and molecular electrostatic potential. Results showed that there are both nucleophilic and electrophilic centers in keto form, while only nucleophilic center is present in phenol form. ? 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据