4.6 Article

Synthesis, growth, crystal structure, vibrational, DFT and HOMO, LUMO analysis on protonated molecule-4-aminopyridinium nicotinate

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE
卷 1239, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2021.130449

关键词

Crystal growth; Growth from solution; Slow evaporation; Hirshfeld surface; DFT

资金

  1. Tamil Nadu State Council for Higher Education [744/2017 A, TNSCST/STP/AR/PS/2014-15]
  2. Tamil Nadu State Council for Science and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India [744/2017 A, TNSCST/STP/AR/PS/2014-15]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An organic crystal 4-aminopyridinium nicotinate (4APNA) single crystal was successfully grown using a slow evaporation method, and its crystallinity and functional groups were thoroughly studied. The crystal's suitability for optical applications was analyzed through UV-Vis-NIR spectroscopy. Theoretical calculations and Hirshfeld surface evaluation were also carried out to further investigate the crystal's properties and intermolecular interactions.
An organic crystal 4-aminopyridinium nicotinate (4APNA) single crystal has been grown by a slow evaporation method. The crystallinity and structural orientation of as-grown 4APNA compound was thoroughly studied using single-crystal X-ray diffraction and powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) and found to be a monoclinic crystal system with P2(1)/c space group. Various functional groups in the grown crystal have been identified using Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectra. The suitability of the crystal for optical applications was analyzed through Ultraviolet-Visible-near-IR Spectroscopy (UV-Vis-NIR) studies. Theoretical calculations were carried out using density functional theory (DFT) to define optical geometry using B3LYP with a 6-311 G (d, p) basis set and the results have been compared with experimental data. The intermolecular interactions that exist inside the crystal have been investigated by Hirshfeld surface evaluation. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据