4.7 Article

Effects of oxyethylene groups on the adsorption behavior and application performance of long alkyl chain phosphate surfactants

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS
卷 345, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2021.117044

关键词

Phosphate; Long alkyl chain; Oxyethylene; Adsorption; Application performance

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFB 0308801]
  2. JALA Research Funds (JALA 2019)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the adsorption behavior of LAPs with different EO addition numbers and finds that the introduction of longer EO chains can significantly improve their surface tension reduction efficiency and kinetic surface activity. In addition, longer EO chains can also improve the wetting, permeability, emulsification, and foam stability of LAPs.
Alcohol ether-derived surfactants have caused extensive research in the past period. Alcohol ether phosphate is one of them. However, detailed information about long alkyl chain phosphates (LAPs) is rarely reported in the previous literature. To bridge this gap, in this paper, LAPs with different oxyethylene (EO) addition numbers are used as the research objects. The influence of EO chain length on the adsorption behavior of LAPs is explored through static surface tension, dynamic surface tension and dynamic contact angle. The results indicate that the LAPs that contain no EO group or with fewer EO groups have very low surface tension reduction efficiency and kinetic surface activity, but it can be significantly improved by introducing longer EO chains. The adsorption process of LAP samples with faster adsorption rate on the gas-liquid surface is the mixed diffusion-kinetic mechanism. It has the fastest adsorption rate when the EO addition number is 9. In addition, the wetting, permeability, emulsification, and foam stability of LAPs can be significantly improved by introducing a longer EO chain, but the antistatic property is better when the EO chain is shorter. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据