4.3 Article

MiR-590-5p inhibits pathological hypertrophy mediated heart failure by targeting RTN4

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR HISTOLOGY
卷 52, 期 5, 页码 955-964

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10735-021-10009-x

关键词

HF; Hypertrophy; MiR-590-5p; RTN4

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study identified that the expression of miR-590-5p was decreased in cardiac tissues of HF mice, and injection of AAV-miR-590-5p attenuated myocardium hypertrophy and myocyte apoptosis. Overexpression of miR-590-5p promoted cell viability, inhibited apoptosis, and decreased protein levels of ANF, BNP, and beta-MHC.
Heart failure (HF) is a rising epidemic and public health burden in modern society. It is of great need to find new biomarkers to ensure a timely diagnosis and to improve treatment and prognosis of the disease. The mouse model of HF was established by thoracic aortic constriction. Color Doppler ultrasound was performed to detect left ventricular end-diastolic diameter. Hematoxylin and eosin staining was conducted to observe the pathological changes of mouse myocardium. The RT-qPCR analysis was performed to detect miR-590-5p and RTN4 expression levels. Western blot was conducted to detect protein levels of the indicated genes. We found that the expression of miR-590-5p was downregulated in cardiac tissues of HF mice. Injection of AAV-miR-590-5p attenuated myocardium hypertrophy and myocyte apoptosis. Additionally, miR-590-5p overexpression promoted viability, inhibited apoptosis, and decreased ANF, BNP and beta-MHC protein levels in H9c2 cell. Mechanistically, miR-590-5p binds to RTN4 3 '-untranslated region, as predicted by starBase online database and evidenced by luciferase reporter assay. Furthermore, miR-590-5p negatively regulates RTN4 mRNA expression and suppresses its translation. The final rescue experiments revealed that miR-590-5p modulated cardiomyocyte phenotypes by binding to RTN4. In conclusion, miR-590-5p modulates myocardium hypertrophy and myocyte apoptosis in HF by downregulating RTN4.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据