4.7 Review

Transcriptional and Epigenetic Regulation of Gasdermins

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 434, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167253

关键词

gasdermin; pyroptosis; transcription; epigenetic; IRF

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gasdermins (GSDM) are a family of proteins that play important roles in cell death, immune response, disease susceptibility, and treatment response. The expression of GSDM genes is influenced by various factors and has been associated with diseases such as asthma, inflammatory bowel disease, and cancer.
Gasdermins (GSDM) are a family of six homologous proteins (GSDMA to E and Pejvakin) in humans. GSDMA-E are pore-forming proteins targeting the plasma membrane to trigger a rapid cell death termed pyroptosis or bacterial membranes to promote antibacterial immune defenses. Activation of GSDM relies on a proteolytic cleavage but is highly dependent on GSDM expression levels. The different GSDM genes have tissue-specific expression pattern although metabolic, environmental signals, cell stress and numerous cytokines modulate their expression levels in tissues. Furthermore, expression of GSDM genes can be modulated by polymorphisms and have been associated with susceptibility to asthma, inflammatory bowel diseases and rhinovirus wheezing illness. Finally, the expression level of GSDMs controls the balance between apoptosis and pyroptosis affecting both the response and the toxicity to chemotactic drugs and antitumoral treatments. Numerous cancer demonstrate positive or negative modulation of GSDM expression levels correlating with distinct tumor-specific prognosis. In this review, we present the transcriptional and epigenetic mechanisms controlling GSDM levels and their functional consequences in asthma, infection, cancers and inflammatory bowel disease to highlight how this first layer of regulations has key consequences on disease susceptibility and response to treatment. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据