4.7 Article

Structural Insights into the Inhibition of Undecaprenyl Pyrophosphate Synthase from Gram-Positive Bacteria

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 64, 期 18, 页码 13540-13550

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c00941

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Foundation
  3. Ontario Research Fund (ORF)
  4. Howard Hughes International Senior Scholar program
  5. GlycoNet
  6. Tier I Canada Research Chair in Antibiotic Discovery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research team provided a structural model for the inhibition of UppS, a potential target for antibiotic development, and demonstrated the enhanced effect of a compound and its derivative on antibiotics with structural rationales. They also presented an improved structural model of clomiphene's inhibition of UppS, laying a foundation for future structure-guided drug design of more potent UppS inhibitors.
The polyprenyl lipid undecaprenyl phosphate (C55P) is the universal carrier lipid for the biosynthesis of bacterial cell wall polymers. C55P is synthesized in its pyrophosphate form by undecaprenyl pyrophosphate synthase (UppS), an essential cis-prenyltransferase that is an attractive target for antibiotic development. We previously identified a compound (MAC-0547630) that showed promise as a novel class of inhibitor and an ability to potentiate beta-lactam antibiotics. Here, we provide a structural model for MAC-0547630's inhibition of UppS and a structural rationale for its enhanced effect on UppS from Bacillus subtilis versus Staphylococcus aureus. We also describe the synthesis of a MAC-0547630 derivative (JPD447), show that it too can potentiate beta-lactam antibiotics, and provide a structural rationale for its improved potentiation. Finally, we present an improved structural model of clomiphene's inhibition of UppS. Taken together, our data provide a foundation for structure-guided drug design of more potent UppS inhibitors in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据