4.7 Article

Design, Synthesis, and Characterization of Novel sn-1 Heterocyclic DAG-Lactones as PKC Activators

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 64, 期 15, 页码 11418-11431

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c00739

关键词

-

资金

  1. FONCyT-ANPCyT [PICT-2015-0362]
  2. CONICET [PIP2014-2016]
  3. National Institute of Industrial Technology (INTI)
  4. National Institutes of Health [ES026023, CA189765, CA196232]
  5. Federal funds from the Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, National Institutes of Health [HHSN261200800001E]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

DAG-lactones are useful templates for designing potent and selective ligands for PKC isozymes, with the ester moiety at the sn-1 position playing a critical role in C1 domain interactions. By introducing a stable isoxazole ring as an ester surrogate in DAG-lactones, it is possible to achieve selectivity for PKC isozymes.
DAG-lactones represent useful templates for the design of potent and selective C1 domain ligands for PKC isozymes. The ester moiety at the sn-1 position, a common feature in this template, is relevant for C1 domain interactions, but it represents a labile group susceptible to endogenous esterases. An interesting challenge involves replacing the ester group of these ligands while still maintaining biological activity. Here, we present the synthesis and functional characterization of novel diacylglycerol-lactones containing heterocyclic ring substituents at the sn-1 position. Our results showed that the new compound 10B12, a DAG-lactone with an isoxazole ring, binds PKCa and PKC epsilon with nanomolar affinity. Remarkably, 10B12 displays preferential selectivity for PKC epsilon translocation in cells and induces a PKC epsilon-dependent reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton into peripheral ruffles in lung cancer cells. We conclude that introducing a stable isoxazole ring as an ester surrogate in DAG-lactones emerges as a novel structural approach to achieve PKC isozyme selectivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据