4.7 Article

Activity of Mitragyna speciosa (Kratom) Alkaloids at Serotonin Receptors

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 64, 期 18, 页码 13510-13523

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c00726

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse [UG3 DA048353, R01 DA047855 01]
  2. University of Florida Clinical and Translational Science Institute
  3. NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [UL1TR001427]
  4. Program of young talent and regional impact-2018, MinCiencias-Colombia
  5. NIH [S10RR031637]
  6. National Science Foundation [DMR1644779]
  7. State of Florida

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research showed that kratom alkaloids have effects on serotonin receptors in vitro and in vivo, with paynantheine and speciogynine exhibiting high affinity for 5-HT(1A)Rs and 5-HT(2B)Rs. These alkaloids can produce antinociceptive properties through a mechanism independent of opioid receptors.
Kratom alkaloids have mostly been evaluated for their opioid activity but less at other targets that could contribute to their physiological effects. Here, we investigated the in vitro and in vivo activity of kratom alkaloids at serotonin receptors (5-HTRs). Paynantheine and speciogynine exhibited high affinity for 5-HT(1A)Rs and 5-HT(2B)Rs, unlike the principal kratom alkaloid mitragynine. Both alkaloids produced antinociceptive properties in rats via an opioid receptor-independent mechanism, and neither activated 5-HT(2B)Rs in vitro. Paynantheine, speciogynine, and mitragynine induced lower lip retraction and antinociception in rats, effects blocked by a selective 5-HT1AR antagonist. In vitro functional assays revealed that the in vivo 5-HT1AR agonistic effects may be due to the metabolites 9-O-desmethylspeciogynine and 9-O-desmethylpaynantheine and not the parent compounds. Both metabolites did not activate 5-HT2BR, suggesting low inherent risk of causing valvulopathy. The 5-HT1AR agonism by kratom alkaloids may contribute to the mood-enhancing effects associated with kratom use.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据