4.7 Article

SARS-CoV-2 R.1 lineage variants that prevailed in Tokyo in March 2021

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY
卷 93, 期 12, 页码 6833-6836

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.27240

关键词

COVID-19; E484K variant; melting curve analysis; R; 1 lineage; SARS-CoV-2

类别

资金

  1. JST-CREST [JPMJCR20H2]
  2. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development [20nk0101612h0901]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study conducted PCR testing on patients who visited the hospital between February and April 2021, revealing a rapid increase in cases with N501Y and E484K mutations from 8% to 46%, with these mutations being associated with R.1 lineage variants. However, there was no evidence of increased disease severity related to the R.1 variants.
The spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants, such as B.1.1.7 and B.1.351, has become a crucial issue worldwide. Therefore, we began testing all patients with COVID-19 for the N501Y and E484K mutations by using polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods. Nasopharyngeal swab samples from 108 patients who visited our hospital between February and April 2021 were analyzed. The samples were analyzed using reverse transcription-PCR with melting curve analysis to detect the N501Y and E484K mutations. A part of the samples was also subjected to whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Clinical parameters such as mortality and admission to the intensive care unit were analyzed to examine the association between increased disease severity and the E484K mutation. The ratio of cases showing the 501N + 484K mutation rapidly increased from 8% in February to 46% in March. WGS revealed that the viruses with 501N + 484K mutation are R.1 lineage variants. Evidence of increased disease severity related to the R.1 variants was not found. We found that the R.1 lineage variants rapidly prevailed in Tokyo in March 2021, which suggests the increased transmissibility of R.1 variants, while they showed no increased severity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据