4.7 Article

Elevated inflammatory markers are associated with poor outcomes in COVID-19 patients treated with remdesivir

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY
卷 94, 期 1, 页码 384-387

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.27280

关键词

coronavirus disease 2019; inflammatory markers; remdesivir

类别

资金

  1. Gilead Sciences Inc.
  2. Clinical and Translational Science Center at Weill Cornell Medical College [1-UL1-TR002384-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The antiviral drug remdesivir has been found to reduce hospital stay duration in COVID-19 patients needing oxygen, but some patients worsen despite treatment. A study identified potential prognostic factors in remdesivir-treated patients, showing higher inflammatory markers in those who deteriorated. Further research into treatment strategies modifying the inflammatory response is supported.
The antiviral remdesivir has been shown to decrease the length of hospital stay in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients requiring supplemental oxygen. However many patients decompensate despite being treated with remdesivir. To identify potential prognostic factors in remdesivir-treated patients, we performed a retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalized at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center between March 23, 2020 and May 27, 2020. We identified 55 patients who were treated with remdesivir for COVID-19 and analyzed inflammatory markers and clinical outcomes. C-reactive protein (CRP), d-dimer, and lactate dehydrogenase levels were significantly higher in patients who progressed to intubation or death by 14 days compared to those who remained stable. CRP levels decreased significantly after remdesivir administration in patients who remained nonintubated over the study period. To our knowledge, this is the largest study to date examining inflammatory markers before and after remdesivir administration. Our findings support further investigation into COVID-19 treatment strategies that modify the inflammatory response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据