4.2 Article

Fentanyl analgesia in asphyxiated newborns treated with therapeutic hypothermia

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE
卷 35, 期 25, 页码 7764-7770

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1937106

关键词

Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy; hypothermia; analgesia; neurodevelopmental outcome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study assessed the safety of fentanyl analgosedation during therapeutic hypothermia in newborns, finding that fentanyl treatment did not negatively impact neurodevelopmental outcomes and may even contribute to improved neuroprotection in asphyxiated cooled newborns.
Introduction Therapeutic hypothermia is the standard care for asphyxiated newborns. Discomfort and pain during treatment are common and may affect therapeutic efficacy of hypothermia. Opioid analgosedation is commonly used in the clinical setting, but its effects in the cooled newborns is poorly investigated. Objective The aim of this study was to assess the safety of fentanyl analgosedation during therapeutic hypothermia, by evaluating severe adverse effects and possible correlation with the neurodevelopmental outcome. Methods We analyzed asphyxiated newborns treated with hypothermia receiving fentanyl intravenous infusion (years 2013-2018). Severe neurodevelopmental outcome was defined as cerebral palsy or Griffith's developmental quotient Results Fentanyl cumulative dose was variable (61.7 +/- 18.5 mu g/kg; range 34.3-120.3 mu g/kg) among 45 enrolled patients. Respiratory depression was recorded in 13.3% cases of 30 spontaneously breathing patients. Severe brain lesions and severe neurodevelopmental disability were found in 24.4 and 11.1% of all included cases, respectively. Higher cumulative fentanyl dose was not associated with poor outcome. Conclusions Fentanyl treatment during therapeutic hypothermia does not negatively affect the neurodevelopmental outcome, thus on the contrary, it may contribute to ameliorate neuroprotection in the asphyxiated cooled newborns.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据