4.6 Article

Influence of yttrium-induced twinning on the recrystallization behavior of magnesium alloys

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 56, 期 32, 页码 18258-18271

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-021-06418-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. Aeronautics Research and Development Board (ARDB) [1823]
  2. National Research Foundation (NRF) - Korean Government [2020R1I1A2070474]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2020R1I1A2070474] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increasing Y content changes the dominant twinning mode and affects the recrystallization behavior of Mg-Y alloys. Precipitates in Mg-10Y alloy pin grain boundaries and twin boundaries, suppressing recrystallization. Grain boundary bulging is identified as the main mechanism of recrystallization in Mg-10Y alloy.
The present study was designed to investigate the role of {11 (2) over bar1} extension twinning on deformation and subsequent recrystallization behavior of binary Mg-Y alloys (Mg-5wt.%Y and Mg-10wt.%Y). The selected alloys in solutiontreated condition were uniaxially deformed at room temperature and then annealed. Increasing the Y content switches the dominant twinning mode from {10 (1) over bar2} extension twins and {10 (1) over bar1} {10 (1) over bar2} double twins, to less commonly observed {11 (2) over tilde1} extension twins. The former was found to assist recrystallization, while the contribution of latter in the formation of new grains was minimal. Moreover, the concurrent precipitation in the Mg-10Y alloy pins the grain boundaries and twin boundaries and thereby suppresses the recrystallization of the alloy despite holding for a longer duration. Finally, the weakening of the annealing texture was only observed in the Mg-5Y alloy as compared to the Mg-10Y alloy. This was attributed to the grain boundary bulging as the prominent mechanism of recrystallization in the Mg-10Y alloy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据