4.6 Article

Gelatin-alginate-hyaluronic acid inks for 3D printing: effects of bioglass addition on printability, rheology and scaffold tensile modulus

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 56, 期 27, 页码 15327-15343

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-021-06250-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. Argentinian Ministry of Education through its Secretary of University Policies-Universities Adding Value [RESOL-2016-2373-E-APN-SECPU]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the printability and rheological properties of gelatin-alginate-hyaluronic acid inks mixed with bioactive glass for 3D bioprinting. The addition of bioactive glass impacted the storage modulus and viscosity of the inks, but improved the printing fidelity and tensile modulus of the scaffolds. Furthermore, the scaffolds showed the formation of hydroxyapatite layer and supported the attachment and growth of fibroblasts, suggesting their potential for soft tissue regeneration research.
Natural hydrogels are widely used for 3D-bioprinting because of their qualities for tissue engineering. Recently, hydrogels have been combined with bioactive glasses, due to their angiogenic properties that aid tissue regeneration. In this work, we studied the printability and the rheological properties of gelatin-alginate-hyaluronic acid inks with 2-8% wt of 45S5 bioglass (BG) that followed a pseudoplastic behavior along the 3D-printing process. The reduction in the storage modulus of the inks after adding BG indicates that the microparticles might disrupt the polymeric network; furthermore, a reduction in the viscosity was determined at BG concentrations above 6%. Inks without BG or up to 2% evidenced the best printing fidelity on 10% infill scaffolds. The tensile modulus of crosslinked 40%-filled scaffolds increased from 130 kPa (without BG) to 160 kPa (6-8% BG). Moreover, a hydroxyapatite layer appeared in scaffolds containing BG 6% and 8% wt after being cultured for 2 days. Attachment and growth of fibroblasts on the scaffolds revealed their cytocompatibility, making these materials an alternative for further research on soft tissues regeneration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据