4.6 Article

Influence of Limestone Mineral Addition in Cements on the Efficacy of SCMs in Mitigating Alkali-Silica Reaction Assessed by Accelerated Mortar Bar Test

期刊

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003728

关键词

Alkali-silica reaction (ASR); Fly ash; Slag; Limestone; Carboaluminates

资金

  1. University of Technology Sydney research through Australian Research Council Research Hub for Nanoscience Based Construction Materials Manufacturing (NANOCOMM)
  2. Cement Concrete and Aggregates Australia (CCAA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that the addition of limestone in cement does not exacerbate alkali-silica reaction (ASR), has no detrimental effect on the efficacy of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) in ASR mitigation, and likewise does not exhibit ASR-mitigating properties under the test conditions.
This study evaluates the effect of limestone mineral addition in cement on the efficacy of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) in mitigating alkali-silica reaction (ASR) using the accelerated mortar bar test (AMBT). Mortars with and without SCMs were prepared by substituting portions of 0% limestone general portland (GP) cement with increasing amounts of limestone. Mortars with SCMs (25% fly ash or 65% slag) exhibit negligible expansion regardless of the limestone content in the binder, whereas mortars without SCMs exhibit high and almost identical expansion for all limestone substitutions. The expansion results show that limestone does not aggravate ASR, has no detrimental effect on the efficacy of SCMs in ASR mitigation, and likewise has no observable ASR-mitigating properties under the test conditions. The calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) composition is not affected by the amount of limestone, which suggests that limestone has no influence on the alkali uptake in the C-S-H. This is supported by the pore solution analysis results where SCMs (both fly ash and slag) have drastically reduced the pore solution alkali concentration over time, whereas limestone substitution only resulted in an alkali reduction equivalent to the substitution (dilution). Moreover, the carboaluminate phases formed when limestone is present were observed to decompose under AMBT conditions; thus, their influence on ASR mitigation is not possible to discern from this study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据