4.6 Article

Material characterization and kinetic parameters based thermoluminescence study of Pakistani Onyx pellets

期刊

JOURNAL OF LUMINESCENCE
卷 236, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2021.118098

关键词

Pakistani Onyx marble; Material characterization; Thermoluminescence; Glow curve; Kinetic parameters; Heat treatment

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study focused on the material characterization and kinetic parameters of Pakistani Onyx marble using Thermoluminescence, demonstrating that heat treated Sample S4 showed enhanced TL response compared to other samples.
The Material characterization and kinetic parameters based Thermoluminescence (TL) study of virgin and heat treated Pakistani Onyx marble is reported. Pellets of mineral under various heat treatments named as virgin (S1), pre-heated (S2), annealed (S3), heat-treated-slowly-cooled (S4), are prepared. Material characterization is performed using TGA, XRD, SEM-EDX, and ICP-OES techniques. ICP & EDXs shows C, O, Ca as major elements and Al, Mn, Mg, Fe, Si as impurity content. Crystalline nature under heat treatment remains unaffected up to 773 K as indicated by the XRD analysis. TGA shows sample is CaCO3 with no mass loss from 303 to 893 K. XRD and TGA analysis concludes that TL analysis is possible within 303-673 K. After 03 Gy of beta-irradiaton dose, the TL responses are investigated. All samples show a thermally stable peak around 552 +/- 3 K. The kinetic features responsible for TL response are studied using Initial rise (IR) method, Chen Peak Shapes (CPS) analysis and P.N. Keating technique. Kinetic order values vary within 1.75-1.05. The activation energy ranges from 0.88 to 1.33 eV, frequency factor appears within 106-1010 s-1. Calculated parameters are validated by comparing MATLAB generated synthetic curves with experimental results. CPS and IR based synthetic curves are in good agreement with the experimental curves. Heat treated Sample S4 shows enhanced TL response as compared to other samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据