4.7 Article

Gel-like pea protein Pickering emulsions at pH 3.0 as a potential intestine-targeted and sustained-release delivery system for β-carotene

期刊

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 79, 期 -, 页码 64-72

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2015.11.025

关键词

Pea protein isolate (PPI); Pickering emulsion; Emulsion gel; Delivery system; beta-Carotene

资金

  1. NNSF of China [31471695, 31171632, 31130042]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, there is increasing interest in the development of food-grade Pickering emulsions as promising delivery systems for bioactive compounds. Our previous work reported that most of the proteins in pea protein isolate (PPI) at pH 3.0, present in the nanoparticle form, can effectively perform as a kind of food-grade Pickering stabilizers for oil-in-water emulsions (LWT, 2014). The purpose of this study was to further report that PPI-stabilized emulsions at pH 3.0 exhibited great potential to act as intestine-targeted and sustained-release delivery systems for beta-carotene. The emulsions were produced by microfluidization at a specific protein concentration of 6.0% (w/v) and varying oil fractions (phi) of 0.2-0.6. The results indicated that increasing phi was favorable for the gel-like network strengthening of these emulsions. The gel formation was largely related to the droplet flocculation as well as inter-floc attractive interactions. The in vitro simulated digestion results showed that the release of beta-carotene during the intestinal digestion of these emulsions could be well modulated by altering phi. The gel-like emulsion at phi = 0.6 exhibited much lower release of beta-carotene, but higher stability towards degradation during the digestion, than that at phi = 0.3. The findings provide important information not only for the design of novel delivery systems for lipophilic bioactive components, but also for the development of plant protein-based formulations. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据