4.4 Article

Bidirectional projection method for multi-attribute group decision making under probabilistic uncertain linguistic environment

期刊

JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS
卷 41, 期 1, 页码 1429-1443

出版社

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JIFS-210313

关键词

Multi-attribute group decision making (MAGDM); probabilistic uncertain linguistic sets (PULTSs); bidirectional projection (BP) method; information entropy; financial products selection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces an integrated model based on information entropy and bidirectional projection method for addressing the multi-attribute group decision making problem in financial product selection, analyzing uncertain linguistic sets and probabilistic weights. The method is practical and effective, and can be applied to other decision-making areas.
The financial products selection in the financial services sector is a traditional multi-attribute group decision making (MAGDM) problem. Probabilistic uncertain linguistic sets (PULTSs) could be used to evaluate the financial products with uncertain linguistic terms and corresponding weights (probabilistic). The bidirectional projection (BP) method could take the bidirectional projection values into account. In this paper, we develop an integration model of information entropy and BP method under PULTSs. First of all, utilizing information entropy derives the priority weights of attributes. Next, utilizing the BP method of the PULTSs to obtain the final ranking of the alternatives. To depict the BP method, the formative vectors of two alternatives are defined, and a weighted vector model and inner product are improved under the PULTSs. In addition, through giving the case of financial products selection and some existing MAGDM methods for comparative analysis, it is proved that the method is practical and effective. The proposed approach also contributes to the effective selection of appropriate options in other decision-making matters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据