4.7 Article

A global alfalfa diversity panel reveals genomic selection signatures in Chinese varieties and genomic associations with root development

期刊

JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE PLANT BIOLOGY
卷 63, 期 11, 页码 1937-1951

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jipb.13172

关键词

alfalfa; genome-wide association studies; genomic selection; geographical origin; population structure; root development

资金

  1. Collaborative Research Key Project
  2. EU [2017YFE0111000]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31971758, 31772656]
  4. Innovation Program of CAAS [ASTIP-IAS14]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sequencing analysis of Chinese alfalfa varieties revealed the impact of geographical origin on genetic diversity and identified candidate genes influencing root growth.
Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) is an important forage crop worldwide. However, little is known about the effects of breeding status and different geographical populations on alfalfa improvement. Here, we sequenced 220 alfalfa core germplasms and determined that Chinese alfalfa cultivars form an independent group, as evidenced by comparisons of F-ST values between different subgroups, suggesting that geographical origin plays an important role in group differentiation. By tracing the influence of geographical regions on the genetic diversity of alfalfa varieties in China, we identified 350 common candidate genetic regions and 686 genes under selection. We also defined 165 loci associated with 24 important traits from genome-wide association studies. Of those, 17 genomic regions closely associated with a given phenotype were under selection, with the underlying haplotypes showing significant differences between subgroups of distinct geographical origins. Based on results from expression analysis and association mapping, we propose that 6-phosphogluconolactonase (MsPGL) and a gene encoding a protein with NHL domains (MsNHL) are critical candidate genes for root growth. In conclusion, our results provide valuable information for alfalfa improvement via molecular breeding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据