4.5 Article

Production of cloned transgenic silkworms by breeding non-diapausing parthenogenetic strains

期刊

JOURNAL OF INSECT PHYSIOLOGY
卷 132, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2021.104265

关键词

Ameiotic parthenogenesis; Transgenesis; Silkworms; Bombyx; Clone

资金

  1. National Agriculture and Food Organization, Japan [JP16F16405]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study developed a method for producing transgenic silkworms by breeding non-diapausing parthenogenetic strains, which increased production efficiency and convenience. Experimental results showed that through mating and selection, silkworms with high parthenogenesis ability could be produced, and the cryopreservation of germplasm was also demonstrated.
Clonal transgenic silkworms are useful for the functional analysis of insect genes and for the production of recombinant proteins. Such silkworms have previously been created using an existing ameiotic parthenogenetic strain. However, the process was labor intensive, and the efficiency of producing transgenic silkworms was very low. To overcome this issue, we developed a more convenient and efficient method by breeding non-diapausing parthenogenetic strains. The strains produced non-diapausing eggs only when the embryogenesis of the parent eggs was performed at low temperatures, which could then be used for injecting vector plasmids. This demonstrated that transgenic silkworms could be produced with greater ease and efficiency. To breed the strains, we crossed the existing parthenogenetic strains with bivoltine strains and made F1 and F2 from each cross. Then we selected the silkworms whose eggs have a high ability of parthenogenesis and became non-diapausing. We also demonstrated that the germplasm could be cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen. Thus, this method increases the efficiency and ease of using genetically engineered silkworms to analyze gene function and produce recombinant proteins, potentially impacting various industries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据