4.6 Review

Photoactive siderophores: Structure, function and biology

期刊

JOURNAL OF INORGANIC BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 221, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2021.111457

关键词

Photoactivity; Siderophores structure; Function; Biological activity; Redox

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-1664657]
  2. NSF [CHE-1710761, CHE-1653892]
  3. Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacteria and fungi have evolved sophisticated systems to acquire the biologically inaccessible trace element iron through high affinity Fe(III)-specific binding compounds called siderophores. A unique subset of siderophores with photoactive iron complexes has been recognized in the last 20 years, which disrupts the traditional understanding of forming and transporting stable Fe(III) complexes.
It is well known that bacteria and fungi have evolved sophisticated systems for acquiring the abundant but biologically inaccessible trace element iron. These systems are based on high affinity Fe(III)-specific binding compounds called siderophores which function to acquire, transport, and process this essential metal ion. Many hundreds of siderophores are now known and their numbers continue to grow. Extensive studies of their isolation, structure, transport, and molecular genetics have been undertaken in the last three decades and have been comprehensively reviewed many times. In this review we focus on a unique subset of siderophores that has only been recognized in the last 20 years, namely those whose iron complexes display photoactivity. This photoactivity, which typically results in the photooxidation of the siderophore ligand with concomitant reduction of Fe(III) to Fe(II), seemingly upsets the siderophore paradigm of forming and transporting only extremely stable Fe(III) complexes into microbial cells. Here we review their structure, synthesis, photochemistry, photoproduct coordination chemistry and explore the potential biological and ecological consequences of this photoactivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据