4.4 Article

Remote Structural Infrasound: Case Studies of Real-Time Infrastructure System Monitoring

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS
卷 27, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000623

关键词

Infrastructure; Civil engineering; Geophysics; Acoustics; Monitoring structural health monitoring; Noncontact sensing; Modal analysis; Disaster recovery

资金

  1. Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Logistics, and Technology [PE 62784/T40/24, 62784/T40/24V, 61102/52C]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Infrastructure in the continental United States is often used beyond its design life due to budgetary constraints and logistical hurdles. New structural health monitoring techniques have been developed to mitigate this issue by identifying potential repair and retrofit needs through modal signatures.
Infrastructure in the continental United States is often used beyond its design life due to budgetary constraints and logistical hurdles. New structural health monitoring techniques have been developed to mitigate the increasingly constrained resources available by identifying the potential need to repair and retrofit aging infrastructure from modal signatures. Large structures, such as bridges and dams, emit infrasound (acoustic energy below that of human perception) at their natural modes of vibration, which can be related to structural health and capacity; this infrasonic energy can propagate tens of kilometers from the infrastructure. Currently, the determination of structural health requires intensive hands-on measurements of individual elements at repeated intervals. Persistent, remote infrasound assessment provides a method for standoff assessment of the modal behavior of structures for structural health monitoring and damage assessment. Case studies and demonstrations of this technology are presented for water control infrastructure systems, transportation infrastructure systems, and riverine infrastructure systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据