Numerical assessment of the erosion risk for cavitating twisted hydrofoil by three methods

In this paper, the large eddy simulation (LES) method in conjunction with the Zwart cavitation model is adopted for the assessment of the erosion risk on a hydrofoil surface. The numerical results are in good agreement with the experiments. On this basis, three methods, namely the intensity function method (IFM), the time-averaged aggressiveness indicators (TAIs) and the gray level method (GLM), are applied for the assessment of the erosion risk. It is shown that the erosion intensity index of the IFM is extremely sensitive to the artificially selected thresholds, which greatly limits the application of the method. The erosion risk predicted by four indicators in the TAIs does not agree well with the experimental results. Further analysis demonstrates that the GLM using the instantaneous pressure field is relatively satisfactory, which can provide a reasonable assessment of the erosion and is not very sensitive to the artificially selected thresholds. To further improve the accuracy of the GLM for the erosion risk prediction, the time-average pressure field is adopted in the GLM for the erosion evaluation. It is suggested that the erosion assessment by using the time-averaged pressure field is in better agreement with the experimental results when compared with that by using the instantaneous pressure field.

Automated summary

This paper adopts the LES method and Zwart cavitation model to evaluate erosion risk on a hydrofoil surface, using three methods including IFM, TAIs and GLM. IFM's erosion intensity index is highly sensitive to thresholds, limiting its application; predictions by the four indicators in TAIs do not align well with experiments; GLM using instantaneous pressure field is satisfactory, while using time-average pressure field improves erosion risk prediction accuracy.