Cardiovascular health effects of wearing a particulate-filtering respirator to reduce particulate matter exposure: a randomized crossover trial

This randomized crossover trial sought to determine whether wearing a high-efficiency particulate-filtering respirator (PFR) improves cardiovascular function over 48 h among healthy college students in Tehran. This trial was conducted from February 14th to 23rd, 2019 and twenty-six participants completed two 48-h intervention periods. Brachial blood pressure (BP) measured by 24-h ambulatory monitoring was the primary health outcome. Secondary outcomes included 48-h heart rate variability (HRV) indices, high-sensitive cardiac troponin (hs-TnT) and other biomarkers. The participants wore the PFR between 10.2 and 11.1 h while awake during the interventions. More than 80% of participants reported increased respiratory resistance while wearing the PFR due to a lack of an exhalation valve. There were no significant differences in brachial BP levels between subjects who wore PFR respirator and those did not. Except for high frequency (HF) power and heart rate (HR), no significant differences between interventions were observed for other HRV metrics. Wearing the PFR led to an increase of 66.0 ms(2) (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.6-110.5) and 79.6 ms(2) (95% CI, 19.0-140.1) in HF power during the first day when the two groups of participants wore the PFR. Night-time HR was significantly increased during the PFR intervention period. Other secondary outcomes were not significantly different between interventions. It is plausible that incomplete exposure reduction due to wearing the PFR less than half of the time or increased respiratory resistance mitigated potential health benefits. Additional trials are warranted to validate the CV protection of wearing PFRs in heavily-polluted cities.

Automated summary

This randomized crossover trial aimed to investigate whether wearing a high-efficiency particulate-filtering respirator (PFR) improves cardiovascular function over 48 hours among healthy college students in Tehran. The results showed that while wearing the PFR increased respiratory resistance and led to an increase in HF power, there were no significant differences in brachial blood pressure or other HRV metrics between the intervention groups. Additional trials are needed to confirm the cardiovascular protection benefits of wearing PFRs in heavily-polluted cities.