4.4 Article

Intronic LINE-1 insertion in SLCO1B3 as a highly prevalent cause of rotor syndrome in East Asian population

期刊

JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 67, 期 2, 页码 71-77

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s10038-021-00967-1

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rotor syndrome is caused by digenic loss-of-function variants in SLCO1B1 and SLCO1B3. The frequency of SLCO1B3 LINE-1 insertion is remarkably high in East Asian populations, especially in Southern Han Chinese, but almost absent in other populations.
Rotor syndrome is caused by digenic loss-of-function variants in SLCO1B1 and SLCO1B3 but only a few studies have reported co-occurring inactivating variants from both genes. A rotor syndrome-causing long interspersed element-1 (LINE-1) insertion in SLCO1B3 had been reported to be highly prevalent in the Japanese population but there has been no additional report. In spite of its known association with various human diseases, LINE-1 is hard to detect with current sequencing technologies. In this study, we aimed to devise a method to screen the LINE-1 insertion variant and investigate the frequency of this variant in various populations. A chimeric sequence, that was generated by concatenating the reference sequence at the junction and a part of inserted LINE-1 sequence, was searched from 725 raw sequencing data files. In cases containing the chimeric sequence, confirmatory long-range PCR and gap-PCR were performed. In total, 95 (13.1%) of 725 patients were positive for the chimeric sequence, and all were confirmed to have the SLCO1B3 LINE-1 insertion by PCR-based tests. The same chimeric sequence was searched from the 1000 Genomes Project data repository and the carrier frequency was remarkably high in the East Asian populations (10.1%), especially in Southern Han Chinese (18.5%), but almost absent in other populations. This SLCO1B3 LINE-1 insertion should be screened in a population-specific manner under suspicion of Rotor syndrome and the methods proposed in this study would enable this in a simple way.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据