4.3 Article

Variation in Genetic Mechanisms for Plumage Polymorphism in Skuas (Stercorarius)

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEREDITY
卷 112, 期 5, 页码 430-435

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esab038

关键词

MC1R; melanin; repeatability of evolution; skua; TYRP1

资金

  1. Norwegian Research Council [170838]
  2. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coloration is evolutionarily labile, providing a useful trait for studying the repeatability of evolution. Polymorphic variation in ventral plumage coloration in skuas is not entirely associated with genetic coding changes at MC1R, suggesting that convergent evolution of plumage polymorphisms in skuas is only partially repeatable at the genetic locus level. The pattern of repeatability in skuas is not phylogenetically aligned, but rather with the nature of the phenotypic variation, with south polar skuas showing a unique sex bias in coloration.
Coloration is evolutionarily labile and so provides an excellent trait for examining the repeatability of evolution. Here, we investigate the repeatability of the evolution of polymorphic variation in ventral plumage coloration in skuas (Stercorarius: Stercorariidae). In 2 species, arctic (S. parasiticus) and pomarine skuas (S. pomarinus), plumage polymorphism was previously shown to be associated with coding changes at the melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R) locus. Here, we show that polymorphism in a third species, the south polar skua (S. maccormicki), is not associated with coding variation at MC1R or with variation at a Z-linked second candidate locus, tyrosinase-related protein 1 (TYRP1). Hence, convergent evolution of plumage polymorphisms in skuas is only partly repeatable at the level of the genetic locus involved. Interestingly, the pattern of repeatability in skuas is aligned not with phylogeny but with the nature of the phenotypic variation. In particular, south polar skuas show a strong sex bias to coloration that is absent in the other species, and it may be that this has a unique genetic architecture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据