4.7 Article

Recovery of Re(VII) from strongly acidic wastewater using sulphide: Acceleration by UV irradiation and the underlying mechanism

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 416, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126233

关键词

Re(VII) recovery; Strongly acidic wastewater; Sulphide precipitation; Active free radicals; Ultraviolet light

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21976195, 22076208, 21976192]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study successfully achieved a high Re(VII) recovery efficiency of 99% within 35 minutes from strongly acidic wastewater by using sulphide coupled with ultraviolet light, offering a potential method for resource recovery from such wastewater.
Strongly acidic wastewater generated from the molybdenum and copper smelting process is of great value for recycling sulfuric acid and valuable metals, such as rhenium (Re). Herein, a high Re(VII) (HReO4) recovery efficiency of 99% within 35 min from strongly acidic wastewater was successfully achieved by using sulphide coupled with ultraviolet (UV) light, and soluble Re(VII) precipitated as Re2S7 in this process. Mechanistic experiments showed that the intermediate Re-S species (i.e., HReO3S) was the dominant limitation responsible for Re(VII) precipitation in the dark, and UV irradiation dramatically accelerated the generation and conversion of HReO3S by inducing the formation of HS center dot and H center dot. The H center dot produced from the photodissociation of H2S promoted HReO4 transformation to H2ReO4 center dot, which rapidly reacted with HS center dot to produce HReO3S, accelerating the conversion of HReO4. The radical-induced acceleration can also take place during the HReO3S conversion by slowly introducing H2S into the strongly acidic wastewater to continuously produce H center dot and HS center dot. This work offers an insight into the improvement of Re(VII) recovery by UV light, which can be potentially applied into resource recovery from strongly acidic wastewater.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据