4.7 Article

First evidence of microplastics occurrence in mixed surface and treated wastewater from two major Saudi Arabian cities and assessment of their ecological risk

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 416, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125747

关键词

Microplastics; Al-Jubail; Riyadh; Surface water; Ecological risk

资金

  1. King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia [RSP-2020/11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assessed the water quality of channels and ponds in two major cities in Saudi Arabia to determine the impact of population on the presence and pollution characteristics of microplastics. The study found significant differences in microplastic concentrations and characteristics between Riyadh and Al-Jubail, with fibers being the dominant form of microplastics.
In this study, water of the channels and ponds that conduct residual water in two most important cities of Saudi Arabia were assessed to ascertain the influence of the population on the occurrence and pollution characteristics of microplastics (MPs) (> 20 mu m in size). Riyadh has 7.6 million inhabitants and is an urban city even though also have industry while Al-Jubail has only 0.78 and is the biggest industrial city. MPs showed an average of 3.2 items/L in Riyadh and 0.2 items/L in Al-Jubail showing a statistically significant difference between both cities. Sampling with a Turton Tow Net of 20 mu m mesh, fibers were dominant in all sites (60%). MPs size was mainly distributed between 80 and 250 mu m (60%), and their major colors were white (40%), red (25%) and blue (20%). Infrared spectral analysis revealed that most of the selected particles were identified as MPs of polypropylene and polyethylene (48.3%). The risk assessment was carried out using both the hazard index (HI) and the pollution load index (PLI). The results showed that, in this case, the decisive index is the PLI since the main difference in the MPs characteristics between the two cities is their concentration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据