4.7 Article

Energy-efficient capture of volatile organic compounds from humid air by granular metal organic gel

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 411, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125057

关键词

Metal organic gel; Granular gel; Adsorption; VOCs; Rapid regeneration

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21677083]
  2. Suzhou-Tsinghua Innovation Guiding Program [2016SZ0104]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The formation of a granular Al-based metal organic gel, CAU-3-NH2(gel), with high surface area and adsorption capacity for VOCs, as well as its outstanding performance in dynamic adsorption and regeneration at mild temperatures, has been reported. The interaction of toluene-framework and adsorption process are investigated by using Grand Canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations.
The discovery of granular adsorbents for the capture of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from humid air and rapid regeneration at low temperature is still a challenge. Here we reported formation of a granular Al-based metal organic gel, CAU-3-NH2(gel), by adjusting heating up time in the synthesis procedure. The water and thermal stable xerogel shows high surface area (1964 m2/g) and adsorption capacity for VOCs (uptakes of toluene and hexanal reach 4.5 and 3.85 mmol/g at P/P0 = 0.1, respectively). Dynamic adsorption experiments further conformed its outstanding adsorption performance for toluene under 50% RH, higher than that of commercial adsorbents and widely studied MOFs including BPL activated carbon, ZSM-5, zeolite 13X, XAD-16, MIL-101(Cr), CAU-1 and ZIF-8. Under the mass space velocity of 12,000 mL/g.h, CAU-3-NH2(gel) kept 99.95% removal ratio of low concentration toluene (100 ppm) over 12 h in 3 cycles at 298 K. Furthermore, desorption experiments show its excellent regenerability under mild temperature (328 K and 358 K). The interaction of toluene-framework and adsorption process are investigated by using Grand Canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据