4.7 Article

Increased disinfection byproducts in the air resulting from intensified disinfection during the COVID-19 pandemic

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 418, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126249

关键词

COVID-19; Disinfection byproducts; Indoor air; Personal care products; Hazard quotient

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21836003, 21621005]
  2. Chinese Academy of Engineering [2020-ZD-15]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increased disinfectant use during the COVID-19 pandemic may unintentionally raise levels of disinfection byproducts (DBPs), highlighting the importance of finding optimal disinfection practices to control virus spread while minimizing DBP concentrations.
Intensified use of disinfectants to control COVID-19 could unintentionally increase the disinfection byproducts (DBPs) in the environment. In indoor spaces, it is critical to determine the optimal disinfection practice to prevent the spread of the virus while keeping DBPs at relatively low levels in the air. The formation of DBPs exceed 0.1 mu g/mg while hypochlorite dosed at 10 mg/m3. The total DBP concentrations in highly disinfected places (100-200 mg/m3 hypochlorite) were as high as 66.8 mu g/m3, and the Hazard Index (HI) was up to 0.84, and both values were much higher than those in less disinfected places (<10 mg/m3 hypochlorite). Taking into account the HI, formation yields and the origin of the DBPs, we recommended 10 mg/m3 as the suggested hypochlorite dose to minimize DBPs generation during routine disinfection for controlling the coronavirus. DBPs in indoor air could be eliminated by ventilation, reducing the usage of personal care products, and wiping the solid surface with water before or after disinfection. These results highlighted the necessity to control air-borne DBPs and their associated health risks arising from intensified disinfection, and will guide the further development of evidence-based regulation on DBP exposure during disinfection and improve public health protection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据