4.3 Article

Muscle ankyrin repeat protein 1 (MARP1) locks titin to the sarcomeric thin filament and is a passive force regulator

期刊

JOURNAL OF GENERAL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 153, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1085/jgp.202112925

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [R01HL121500, R35HL144998]
  2. Marie SklodowskaCurie Research and Innovation Staff Exchange 2014 project [645648]
  3. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases grant [R01AR073179]
  4. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [645648] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates that MARP1 interacts with F-actin and forms a complex with titin-N2A, which leads to the locking of titin to the thin filament, resulting in increased passive force. The mechanism proposed here suggests that in stressed muscle, MARP1 plays a role in protecting the sarcomere from mechanical damage.
Muscle ankyrin repeat protein 1 (MARP1) is frequently up-regulated in stressed muscle, but its effect on skeletal muscle function is poorly understood. Here, we focused on its interaction with the titin-N2A element, found in titin's molecular spring region. We show that MARP1 binds to F-actin, and that this interaction is stronger when MARP1 forms a complex with titin-N2A. Mechanics and super-resolution microscopy revealed that MARP1 locks titin-N2A to the sarcomeric thin filament, causing increased extension of titin's elastic PEVK element and, importantly, increased passive force. In support of this mechanism, removal of thin filaments abolished the effect of MARP1 on passive force. The clinical relevance of this mechanism was established in diaphragm myofibers of mechanically ventilated rats and of critically ill patients. Thus, MARP1 regulates passive force by locking titin to the thin filament. We propose that in stressed muscle, this mechanism protects the sarcomere from mechanical damage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据