4.7 Article

Air-water interfacial properties of enzymatic wheat gluten hydrolyzates determine their foaming behavior

期刊

FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS
卷 55, 期 -, 页码 155-162

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.11.017

关键词

Gluten hydrolyzates; Protein foam; Langmuir isotherm; Adsorption kinetics; Protein concentration; Air-water interface

资金

  1. Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO, Brussels, Belgium)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Insight in the link between foaming and interfacial properties of proteins can increase their potential as functional agents in food systems. Here, foaming capacity and stability of structurally different peptic and tryptic wheat gluten hydrolyzates were related to the kinetics of their adsorption at an air-water interface as well as to the properties of a compressed protein film at this interface. Foams from degree of hydrolysis (DH, i.e. the percentage of cleaved peptide bonds) 2 hydrolyzates were more stable than those from their DH 6 counterparts, and this at all protein concentrations tested. However, at protein concentrations from 0.010% to 0.050% (w(prot)/v), peptic DH 2 and 6 hydrolyzates had better foaming stability than their tryptic counterparts of the same DH. The opposite was observed when protein concentrations ranged from 0.050% to 0.150% (w(prot)/v). These observations can in part be explained by the molecular mass composition of the samples and, more importantly, by high levels of hydrophobic peptides in the DH 2 samples. The calculation of an average elasticity (up to 20-25 mN/m) from the variation in surface pressure for a variation in surface area in Langmuir isotherms showed that DH 2 samples had higher elasticity than DH 6 samples, which was in agreement with their foaming stabilities at various protein concentrations. Additionally, although not usually considered in literature, it seemed there was a correspondence between surface pressure at different protein surface concentrations and foaming stability at different protein concentrations. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据