4.7 Article

Physicochemical, crystalline, morphological, pasting and thermal properties of modified lotus rhizome (Nelumbo nucifera) starch

期刊

FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS
卷 60, 期 -, 页码 50-58

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.03.013

关键词

Rhizome starch; Chemical modification; Morphology; FTIR; XRD; Thermal properties

资金

  1. Ministry of Human Resource Development, India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chemical modification of lotus rhizome starch was carried out for the development of oxidized (OLS), cross-linked (CLS) and dual modified i.e. oxidized cross-linked (OCLS) and cross-linked oxidized (COLS) starches. Carbonyl (0.03-0.06%), carboxyl content (0.08-0.19%), degree of cross-linking, physicochemical, pasting, morphological, thermal, FTIR and XRD analyses of modified starches confirmed the successful modification of native starch. Amylose content of modified starches significantly decreased as a consequence of starch modification, however, water binding capacity and color value increased. Swelling power and solubility of both native and modified starches increased with temperature range (50 degrees-90 degrees C). The light transmittance of modified starches was highly improved compared to the native starch, except for cross-linked starch. X-ray diffractogram illustrated an increase in degree of crystallinity of modified starches. The morphology of the starch granules as observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM) presented surface roughness in case of oxidized and dual modified starches, whereas smooth surface of native and cross-linked starches was observed. Pasting profile of modified starches analyzed using rapid visco analyzer (RVA) presented a decrease in viscosity compared to its native counterpart. Differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) was used to study the phase transitions associated with gelatinization, and exhibited lower enthalpy values (A1-18-0) for modified starches as compared to native starch. (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据