4.4 Article

Effect of ratio of oil to sample on the quality of fried fish (Pseudorasbora parva)

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jfpp.15712

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2020YFD0900905]
  2. Shanghai University Knowledge Service Platform and Shanghai Ocean University Aquatic Animal Breeding Center [ZFI206]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study analyzed the effects of different oil to sample ratios on the quality parameters of fried fish, with 30:1 identified as the optimal OTS ratio.
The effects of the ratio of oil to sample (OTS) (10:1, 20:1, 30:1, 40:1, and 50:1) on the content and status of moisture and oil, water activity, color, texture, volumetric shrinkage, frying yield (Y-f), dielectric properties, and microstructure of fried fish (Pseudorasbora parva, FF) fried at 170celcius for 5 min were investigated. The moisture content, water activity, L*, springiness, and Y-f of FF were significantly decrease to 21.35%, 0.935%, 31.54%, 0.65%, and 37.88%, respectively, and transverse relaxation time, dielectric constant and dielectric loss factor also showed a decreasing trend, while a*, b*, Delta E, hardness, gumminess, chewiness, and volumetric shrinkage increased to 7.45%, 15.87%, 30.17%, 1,013.88%, 475.65%, 372.76%, and 50.45% with an increased ratio of OTS, while oil content initially increased (31.18%-37.83%) followed by a significant decrease (37.83%-35.07%; p < .05). SEM revealed severe surface deformation and internal pore changes in the FF. Pearson correlation analysis indicated that there was a significant correlation between the quality parameters of FF (|r| >= 0.917, p < .01), except oil content (p < .01). Considering the sensory quality, Y-f, and dielectric properties of FF, 30:1 was the optimal ratio of OTS. Practical applications During the production of fried food, it is vital to choose an appropriate ratio of oil to sample (OTS). The effects of the ratio of OTS on quality parameters of fried fish are analyzed and presented here. It can be concluded that 30:1 was the optimal ratio of OTS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据