4.4 Article

Ultrasonication increases γ-aminobutyric acid accumulation in coffee leaves and affects total phenolic content and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitory activity

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jfpp.15777

关键词

-

资金

  1. Jiangsu, Specially Appointed Professor Program [19TPJS-002]
  2. Senior Talent Startup Fund of Jiangsu University [4111360002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that ultrasonication helps increase GABA content and ACE inhibitory activity in coffee leaves, with the best results seen under optimal conditions. Ultrasonication also enhances total phenolic content, but prolonged treatment may lead to oxidation affecting ACE inhibitory activity.
In this study, the accumulation of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in coffee leaves under ultrasonication and the impacts on total phenolic content (TPC), the activities of glutamate decarboxylase (GAD) and GABA transaminase (GABA-T), and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) were investigated. The pH, incubation time, and ultrasonic power were the three most important factors that affected the accumulation of GABA. Coffee leaves treated with 20/40 kHz ultrasound have the highest GABA and the greatest GAD and ACE inhibitory activity. After optimization with a Box-Behnken design, GABA content was increased by 1.6 times under the optimal conditions of pH 5.9, incubation time 6.6 hr, and ultrasonic power 150 W. Our study indicated that ultrasonication activated GAD while inhibited GABA-T, thereby leading to an increase in GABA and ACE inhibitory activity. Ultrasonication also enhanced TPC; however, long time incubation caused the oxidation of phenolic compounds, and thus, affected the ACE inhibitory activity. Novelty impact statement This is the first research that studied the enrichment of Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in coffee leaves using ultrasound stress. GABA-enriched coffee leaves can be used to prepare tea-like beverage or natural health products to prevent hypertension, anxiety, and sleeplessness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据