4.7 Article

Colour and chlorophyll level modelling in vacuum-precooled green beans during storage

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING
卷 301, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2021.110523

关键词

Green beans; Chlorophyll; Colour; Modelling

资金

  1. Key R&D Program of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region [2018BCF01001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study established kinetic models and shelf life prediction models for colour and chlorophyll levels in vacuum-precooled green beans using reaction kinetics and the Arrhenius equation. Results showed that the change rate constants of colour parameters and chlorophyll levels followed the Arrhenius law dependence on temperature, successfully predicting the shelf life of the green beans.
To investigate the changes in colour and chlorophyll levels in vacuum-precooled green beans during storage, kinetic models and shelf life prediction models of these quality indices were established by reaction kinetics and the Arrhenius equation. Linear regression analysis was used to study the changes in colour and chlorophyll levels during 12 d of storage at 0 degrees C, 5 degrees C, 10 degrees C and 25 degrees C, and the relationship between chlorophyll level and total colour difference (.E) was also determined. The results showed that the colour and chlorophyll levels retained in vacuum-precooled green beans were better than those in the control group during storage. A linear regression analysis revealed that the change rate constants of colour parameters (L*, a*, b* and Delta E) and chlorophyll levels followed the Arrhenius law dependence on temperature. Colour and chlorophyll levels were successfully described by zero-order and first-order reactions, respectively. In addition, the shelf life based on.E and chlorophyll level changes of 10% was similar to that at a cut-off score of 6 by sensory evaluation. It was suggested that the kinetics model could accurately predict the shelf life and changes of colour and chlorophyll levels in vacuum-precooled green beans during storage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据