4.6 Article

A comparative analysis on the anthocyanin composition of 74 blueberry cultivars from China

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2021.104051

关键词

Blueberry cultivars; Anthocyanins; Malvidin; Delphinidin; Petunidin; TAC; HPLC

资金

  1. Jiangsu Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Fund [CX (16) 1016]
  2. 333 High-level Talent Project Training Funding of Jiangsu Province [BRA2018380]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Blueberries are rich in anthocyanins and have various beneficial effects on human health. This study evaluated the anthocyanin composition of 74 blueberry cultivars in southern China and found that different cultivars had similar anthocyanin profiles but varying amounts of individual compounds. Malvidin, delphinidin, and petunidin were the major contributors to total anthocyanin content, with malvidin-3-O-galactoside having the highest content among the cultivars.
Blueberries are rich in anthocyanins and studied for their numerous beneficial effects on human health. The present study aimed to evaluate the anthocyanin composition of 74 blueberries collected in the south of China as well as analyze the phytochemical relationships among cultivars. Rabbiteye, southern highbush, northern highbush, half-highbush and lowbush blueberry cultivars were analyzed. Delphinidin, cyanidin, petunidin, and malvidin had three glycoside forms including galactoside, glucoside, and arabinoside, while peonidin had only galactoside form. The anthocyanin profile was similar among cultivars but amounts of individual compound differed. Malvidin, delphinidin and petunidin were the major contributors to total anthocyanin content (TAC), and malvidin-3-O-galactoside had the highest content among the 74 blueberry cultivars. Gardenblue had the highest TAC (2,235.51 +/- 54.18 mu g cyanidin 3-glucoside equivalent g-1 wet weight). In general, rabbiteye had significantly higher TAC than other categories analyzed in this study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据