4.5 Article

The effect of gamma and electron beam irradiation on the structural and physicochemical properties of myofibrillar protein and myosin from grass carp

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 45, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jfbc.13828

关键词

electron beam; myofibrillar protein; myosin; gamma-ray irradiation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31871870]
  2. Freshwater products Processing Innovation Team of Hubei due to my negligence when proofreading the manuscript Innovation Center of Agriculture Science and Technology [2020-620-000-002-03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research findings showed that exposure to different doses of radiation resulted in changes in the physicochemical properties of myofibrillar protein and myosin from grass carp, with electron beam irradiation having a greater impact compared to gamma-ray irradiation.
Myofibrillar protein (MPS) and myosin (MS) from grass carp was irradiated by gamma-ray and electron beam (EB) irradiation with different dose (2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 kGy). The changes in the physicochemical properties (solubility, Ca2+-ATPase activity, total and reactive sulfhydryl content, surface hydrophobicity [S-0-ANS]), and structure of MPS and MS were investigated in the present work. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis revealed that there were degradation and aggregation of MPS and MS caused by irradiation, and the disappearance of myosin heavy chains (MHC) irradiated by EB was earlier than that of irradiated by gamma-ray. As compared with MPS, the extracted MS was more easily destroyed. With the increase of irradiation dose, the particle size, solubility, Ca2+-ATPase activity, and SH content of MPS and MS decreased (p < .05), while the S-0-ANS first increased and then decreased. Two-way analysis of variance results suggested that the degree of protein denaturation depends on the irradiation mode and dose. Compared with gamma-ray irradiation, the EB irradiation had a greater impact on the physicochemical properties of MPS and MS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据